How Long Do Gaming Pc Last

promotion Piracy Assault Law

I've never liked bullfighting. I think an act so savage and primitive stone dog, or put the microwave on a kitten. I am not interested to say it's hypocrisy does not make sense, but I eat meat and I oppose bullfighting.

I have many estimates that are animal activists, ecologists, environmentalists, or some other green trend. I'm not going for any of these alternatives, just do not like bullfighting and I have the right to say it publicly.

I do not expect or agree with that are prohibited by law, but if I want to disappear this stupid tradition. That's why I have repeatedly taken part in marches and planting anti-bullfighting.

Last Saturday in the capital held a sit-in protest outside the Plaza de Toros. Second Cercado, a friend of ours, is in full realization of the documentary "Toros" more or less a year. His co-producer, Stuart Novoa, friend and commenter on this blog, was filming the protest when he was assaulted physically damaged your computer, and stole the tape of which was documenting the echos.

In these protests the attacks are somewhat typical, unfortunately. I too have been beaten, insulted, gassed. I've seen protesters insulting, as well as hitting bull, even with sticks dissent.

panas The case of the above is just another example of intolerance by those who use tolerance as his shield. And of course another example of that in these cases, the headbangers, idle, having nothing better to do than protest by an animal, rarely are the ones who started the violence.

PS: Here is the link of the blog Eat Protest where what it tells Stuart happened. Greetings

Neoprene Washers Pari

taurine film? Police

I always wondered why the State finances films and not tecnocumbia. It is easier and cheaper to make, more fun and gets a lot more people than one of those rare movies misunderstood.
audiovisual
I am, I love movies and would like someday to do great films that win awards like the strange and eccentric vanguard. But the fact that I like something, does not mean that support will be spent state resources to encourage him.

is true, I accept, I participated in the call for competitive grants CNCINE hoping to fund short that I have at the tip of the tongue for almost two years. An average situation is confusing, but in my defense I say that the fact that wander the streets and enjoy state parks, not to say that it is statist. My insurance is state owned, and still defend the monopolization of health.

important thing here is that I do not defend the law of cinema. I write this because I read a call where you call everyone "who does or dream of making movies" to defend the law. And it is not. If the law exists, try to take advantage of it, but there is that grief, and if removed all the better for everyone.

I do not agree with the state fund with the money of all, certain few activities. Much less see the sense in which discriminate against some film financing. It may well be the pole dance or ice skating, or graffiti, or puppet shows. Why spend hundreds of thousands of dollars for a movie filmed three cats per year. Film which, moreover, the vast majority of taxpayers do not even see, because not interested in a hell.

My logic is: if the vast majority of people will like, interested, or at least the filmmakers would like to support Ecuador, then it would be financed through taxes. Unfortunately not, and as I always say: if something can not afford it alone is because nobody cares and has no reason to be more than one's own ego and satisfaction of the user. For something we're artists. Only we must understand that if nobody pays to see our "work", then we are doomed or stop it or find our own ways of doing it, but we have no right to plunder the pockets of others to fund it.

is a hard road, indeed. Similar to a musician, teatrero, wizard or painter who wants to dedicate his life to express themselves through their art. Maybe a little more difficult due to the very high cost difference between a record and film a feature film, but it is what choose. It is assumed that is what we like.

My lifelong dream is to find a rich old woman, with silver, which you love oral sex and is willing to be my patron. Until that happens, I guess I will break my back to save something, and seek and seek financial support for companies, foundations, friends, family, etc. but I will not stand by for lack of funds. Much less will be unveiled to whine to afford what the bureaucrats decide what is maybe one of the biggest fads of my life making films.

Dresses For The Zulu Ball

police ... that you look bitter .... An honest post

Just when I thought to kill this blog, one of my fans made me anonymous a video where a paco hits a city that apparently had just been assaulted. The echo came a week ago and more, but honestly between jobs, vices and other work, I have no time to see what's happening around me.

The truth is that the video I am outraged but not surprised. I've seen so much crap by the National Police that the only difference is that now at last been captured on video and reported publicly. That is an achievement.

Police To me it sucks, thankfully I am not alone in this, almost everyone I've spoken with agree that the police is shit. Unfortunately most people think which is a necessary evil ... Not so, the police is shit, period. Not a bad n EQUIRED are not essential and in fact I think its demise would benefit us.

"No police everything would be chaos. Everyone would do what he wanted. We would live in the law of the jungle. Any wild could have a gun. All would attack us. It would be like in the old west."

And what is the difference with the current situation? The only real difference is that instead of any wild have a gun, some wildlife can currently only have weapons. Ordinary people live at the expense of a criminal rob us, waiting for others to save us criminals.

is true people are stupid freakin, violent, evil, aggressive, uncontrollable, and all a statist say, but none of us have monopolized power. The real difference, huge difference, an appalling difference between a school bully, a frog in the neighborhood and a policeman, is that the officer has absolute control and monopoly laws and strength.

as the story is told in a one day where no one village to fall to blows, the alleged leader bought a shotgun warning that only he can have that take care of the rest. Just stupid. It makes no sense to guard against aggressors relatively equal, we will create a vastly superior aggressor.

why I propose to decentralize security. Denationalise security. Privatization of security, even if it hurts some. Let each one take care of your back, or take care of each other like good Samaritans, or believe neighborhood security squads, or hire a private security company, or whatever, but that no longer exists state police.

What happens if an armed group is imposed by force, begins to bring their laws, to collect taxes and no one can topple over or worse is institutionalized and consider it a necessary evil? "What horrorozo be true!?