there who understand industrial relations as a dual battle: rich vs. poor, employers versus employees, operators vs exploited. Just as there are anarchists that are placed next to the workers without valid reason, there are also libertarians who take the side of the employer without really thinking. In my opinion it is time to leave ridiculous positions.
This is not to get from one side or another, but to defend what is right. I do not defend the workers, or employers, but to free contracts. I think the contracts are all that can govern in a fair employment relationship. What is signed is to be met, period.
If a company does not recruit from dependence and want to pay for services, it seems perfectly legitimate. I am among those who believe the state should not intervene in relations between people, even if work question. If a company decides it no longer wants you hired and prefers to pay you bill, fine. The problem comes when the company refuses to fulfill the agreement you signed freely.
In an optimal case, the company would terminate the contract of dependence, we liquidated according to the contract and negotiate a new contract for invoice. However, I know of cases where they want the employee to sign a waiver to avoid having to liquidate. Again buy the waiver to avoid state taxation does not seem anything wrong as long as both parties agree, but it is not.
A friend of mine from a printing press, it is under pressure to sign the waiver with the caveat that if you do not sign will never work there. Giving someone the option only if you sign the waiver continues to work there may be a blackmail rather low, but not a crime. In any case everyone is free to decide whom to hire or who does not. But the situation gets worse because if you do not sign, warn them, just find a way of dismissing him out and not give significant settlement. It is at that precise moment when the company breaks the contract and start the extortion against an employee helpless. My buddy could claim to file a complaint, but we all know that even with all their life savings may afford a lawyer with the strength and influence of one of the most recognized companies in the graphics market.
This company is breaking a signed contract with an employee freely. It is true that there are state laws and enforcement, but the employee does not put them and are there to hurt both sides. It is totally illegitimate to try to put the company as justification for government-imposed break his commitment. They were free to sign or not sign, or make a different contract, or not hire anyone. Now they must fulfill.
Turning around a few years ago when I worked in a production occurred otherwise. In second full day of shooting a commercial, the gaffer and electrical team decided they would not do more unless they pay a greater amount and under certain conditions. They knew they were in a condition of benefit and wanted to take advantage of that. Stop the Recording list with cameras, equipment, location, actors, extras, cattering, and schedule for another day is enormously expensive and absurd. It was much more logical to see what the union demanded.
My boss at the time, in the position they had met with the newly formed group and saying nothing gave them 25 cents each for go home. "If you let yourself see the eggs once, do not expect you to respect the next." not even reached the lunch. He lit up the set, and did the work of 10 men. It was a great teacher.
is true that I was not paying as much as on other occasions, it is true that it was hard work, but they should have negotiated before closing. They had agreed to work 3 days a certain amount and ask for a raise was illegitimate threatening not to go the other days.
What I am saying is that in the first case obviously support if employees create a union, but in the second the employer was right. So I do not support unions red or yellow just to get the side of a class, I defend free markets and free contract.
0 comments:
Post a Comment